Search results for "Positive probability"

showing 3 items of 3 documents

BARGAINING WITH COMMITMENT UNDER AN UNCERTAIN DEADLINE

2006

We consider an infinite horizon bargaining game in which a deadline can arise with positive probability and where players possess an endogenous commitment device. We show that for any truncation of the game, the equilibrium agreement can only take place if the deadline arises within this finite horizon. Since the deadline is an uncertain event, the equilibrium exhibits agreements which are delayed with positive probability.

Commitment deviceComputer Science::Computer Science and Game TheoryGeneral Computer ScienceTruncationFinite horizonC78 [Bargaining endogenous commitment delays uncertain deadline JEL Classification]jel:M2MicroeconomicsEconomicsjel:C0Infinite horizonStatistics Probability and UncertaintyBusiness and International Managementjel:D5jel:B4Mathematical economicsComputer Science::Operating Systemsjel:C6jel:D7Positive probabilityComputer Science::Databasesjel:C7Event (probability theory)International Game Theory Review
researchProduct

Partially revocable commitments in a negotiation with a deadline

2004

Abstract [Fershtman, C., Seidmann, D., 1993. Deadline effects and inefficient delay in bargaining with endogenous commitment. Journal of Economic Theory 60, 306–321] showed that the presence of an irrevocable endogenous commitment with a fixed deadline results in the so called deadline effect. In this paper we analyse the effects of partially revocable endogenous commitments of a seller in an infinite horizon negotiation in which a deadline can arise with positive probability. We obtain that when the commitment possesses a sufficiently large revocable part not only the inefficient delays disappear and an immediate agreement is reached but also the commitment has a value. On the other hand, …

MicroeconomicsEconomics and EconometricsNegotiationWelfare economicsmedia_common.quotation_subjectValue (economics)EconomicsComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDSOCIETYInfinite horizonPositive probabilitymedia_commonResearch in Economics
researchProduct

Expectation Damages and Bilateral Cooperative Investments

2012

We examine the efficiency of the standard breach remedy expectation damages in a setting where the buyer invests cooperatively and the seller invests both cooperatively and selfishly. Contracts may specify a required quality level and an upper bound to the seller's coordination costs. We find that it is optimal to write an augmented Cadillac contract in which quality is stipulated such that it cannot be met with positive probability together with a very low price. Thus, the seller becomes a residual claimant and the coordination-cost threshold can be used to balance the incentives of the buyer.

media_common.quotation_subjectjel:D86Upper and lower boundsMicroeconomicsEconomicsddc:330C70Production (economics)Incomplete contractsQuality (business)Residual claimantPositive probabilitymedia_commonjel:C70Actuarial scienceK12TheoryofComputation_GENERALInvestment (macroeconomics)jel:K12IncentiveBalance (accounting)ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDSOCIETYQuality levelBusinessExpectation damagesD86LawFinanceAmerican Law and Economics Review
researchProduct